SCOTUS to Examine Extraterritorial Infringement Liability and Damages

March 27, 2018
Post by Blog Staff

As a follow up to the MVS Briefs Article, “Extraterritorial Infringement Liability,” authored by Heidi S. Nebel, this blog post examines the briefing in the Western Geco LLC v. ION Geophsycial Corp. case set for oral argument before the United States Supreme Court on April 16, 2018.

The question presented to the Court is “[w]hether the court of appeals erred in holding that lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases where patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f).” Petition for Writ of Certiorari, WesternGeco, No. 16-1011 (available here).

The Federal Circuit applied the general presumption against extraterritoriality standard, thus basically implying that foreign actions are intervening acts which would sever traditional proximate cause analysis for infringement.

It is the Petitioner’s argument that the presumption against extraterritoriality should not apply here, as the statutes regarding infringement and damages are clear, i.e., the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(1) and (2), which address the situation where a defendant successfully avoided infringement by exporting multiple sub-assemblies of an infringing product which could be easily reassembled upon receipt. See Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp., 406 U.S. 518, 526-538 (1972).

The Respondent rephrases the question presented to state: "[w]hether this Court should overrule Microsoft v. AT&T and eliminate the presumption against extraterritoriality so that infringers are subject to damages under § 284 based on non-infringing foreign use by third parties.” The Microsoft v. AT&T decision held that the presumption against territoriality applied to all laws, and especially patent laws. See 550 U.S. 437 (2007).


Stay tuned to Filewrapper for our next blog post related to this case, which will cover the oral arguments taking place on April 16, 2018.

Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.