Filewrapper®

Patent cases in 2006 result in over $1 billion in damages awarded

January 03, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

According to a study released by Bloomberg, United States juries in patent cases awarded a total of over $1 billion in damages in cases that went to jury trial in 2006, the largest single year ever. The largest award went to Rambus, a California maker of computer memory chips, who won a $307 million verdict against South Korean rival Hynix Semiconductor in April, although the verdict was eventually reduced to $133 million by the judge in that case. While the overall total of awards is up, the average jury award for the top 50 verdicts was slightly down (from $8 million to $6.3 million). It is noteworthy that this figure does not include various publicized settlements in patent cases, such as the $612.5 million settlement between BlackBerry® maker Research in Motion and patent holding company NTP in March. As a very low percentage of civil cases actually go to trial (for example, in 2002, only 1.8% went to trial, more data on the decline of civil trials here), one can only speculate as to the total amount of money that changed hands as a result of patent cases in 2006 between settlements and trials combined. This is further evidence of the value of intellectual property to companies when effectively enforced.


Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment



Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.