Filewrapper®

Wall Street Journal on Viacom v. YouTube

March 23, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

Walter Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal has a column discussing the Viacom v. YouTube case (previously blogged about here). Mr. Mossberg thinks the problem is not confined to the particular dispute between Viacom and YouTube/Google, but rather is indicative of a need for greater guidance in copyright law from Congress. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which was supposed to help to bring copyright law into the digital age, was passed in 1998. Many technologies available now were not even conceived of in 1998, so Mr. Mossberg points out that there is uncertainty with regard to what is and is not permissible under copyright law and the DMCA with regard to these new technologies.

More thoughts on these issues after the jump.

Some of the claimed uncertainty with the DMCA involves older concepts, such as the concept of fair use codified in 17 U.S.C. § 107. Fair use is a balancing act between the rights of copyright holders and the rights of the public to use copyrighted material for certain protected purposes, such as those protected by the First Amendment. The "uncertainty" caused by fair use is that every case is different: use of a 30-second sound clip may be fair use in one situation but copyright infringement in another. It is this fact-intensive nature of fair use that also results in the uncertainty Mr. Mossberg notes in his column. However, because fair use concepts are difficult to define with bright-line rules, a legislative solution to this "uncertainty" may not be possible. What makes Mr. Mossberg's column even more interesting is that he has a corresponding video column on the same issue. Either click here for the video on the issue, or just click below:

Mr. Mossberg wants clearer guidance from Congress to help sort these issues out. In the mean time, we will be watching the Viacom v. YouTube case closely, as it has the potential to further shape how copyright law will interact with the Internet. Hat tip: PK and EFF.

Update: The Daily Show (on Viacom's Comedy Central network) provides this amusing video regarding the lawsuit.

Further update: Jason Fry of the Wall Street Journal also weighs in on the state of copyright law.


Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment



Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Enter your name and email address to receive the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Vorhees & Sease, P.L.C.