USPTO gives applicants a bit of a break during transition to new continuation and claim limit rules

October 11, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

In an announcement yesterday, the USPTO clarified some aspects of the new continuation and claim limit rules. Of particular note are the following:

  • For applications filed before November 1, 2007, applicants need not identify all applications and patents having a common inventor, common assignee, and a priority date within two months. Applicants will still have to identify applications and patents having the same priority date and having an inventor in common and common assignee.
  • For continuation-in-part applications that have not received a first office action on the merits, applicants will have until February 1, 2008 to comply with the requirement to identify which claims are directed toward subject matter entitled to the earlier priority date. For CIP applications that have received a first office action on the merits, the requirement to make this identification is waived.
  • The USPTO also clarified the definition of "examination" as it applies to 37 C.F.R. § 1.78(d)(1)(ii)(B). While the rule as it was written would have allowed "examination" to include international preliminary examination during Chapter II, the USPTO has now stated that international preliminary examination is not "examination" for purposes of this rule. This means that the applicant will be able to file divisional applications from a U.S. national phase application where the examiner makes a restriction requirement, even if those claims were examined by the PCT during Chapter II.

There are additional clarifications regarding divisional applications as applied to the "one more" continuation permitted in the full release.

Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.