Filewrapper®

USPTO files opposition to Glaxo's motion for preliminary injunction against new rules

October 29, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

Apparently the government's lawyers had a long weekend, because on Sunday, the USPTO filed its opposition to Glaxo's motion for preliminary injunction against the new claim and continuation limit rules. Included with the opposition were a whopping 34 attachments making up 7 exhibits.

The USPTO makes the expected arguments. First, it argues that it is entitled to Chevron deference in its interpretation of the patent statutes. Then, it argues that the statutory provisions relating to continuing applications, claims, and requests for continuing examination are not mandatory, and that it has not absolutely limited the number of such filings. The brief also attacks the argument that the new rules aren't really going to help the USPTO's backlog. In addition, it asserts that Glaxo will not suffer irreparable harm if the rules are enjoined, but that the USPTO (somehow) will be irreparably harmed if the rules are enjoined.

All in all, the response basically follows the USPTO management's company line. The good news is that Glaxo should have sufficient time to file a reply before the hearing on October 31.

Relevant links:

Go to this post for the motion for preliminary injunction and other court documents in the case.


Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment



Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.

Captcha Image