USPTO Director Jon Dudas talks patent reform

February 28, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

Over at ZDnet there is very good coverage of a recent speech about patent reform by USPTO director Jon Dudas. Mr. Dudas spoke at the Tech Policy Summit on the issue of whether the patent system was hurting innovation. Mr. Dudas stated that the biggest problem leading to bad quality patents is the obviousness requirement, which the Supreme Court is addressing in the KSR v. Teleflex case argued last November (a decision is expected soon). There, the Court is considering whether the Federal Circuit's test for obviousness is correct or should be revised. Currently, to show an invention to be obvious, there must be some "teaching, suggestion, or motivation" to either combine or modify prior art references to produce the invention. Many believe that the Supreme Court will either throw out this test, or at least make it not the exclusive way an invention can be shown to be obvious. The full coverage of his comments is worth a look, as he addresses issues such as how the debate about patent reform is framed, efficiency at the USPTO, and the potential for third-party submisssions of prior art during the examination process, such as the Peer to Patent project being developed by New York Law School. As previously blogged here, the UK is also considering a third-party review process.

Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.