Roundup of media coverage of Microsoft v. AT&T oral arguments, more to come for Microsoft?

February 23, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

Now that the oral arguments before the Supreme Court have passed, various media outlets have had the opportunity to weigh in on the arguments and offer their predictions as to how the case will come out. A sampling of this media coverage is below: Seattle Post Intelligencer
USA Today
Boston Globe
Houston Chronicle
Los Angeles Times
BBC News
Wall Street Journal (subscription required)
EE Times
While the early predictions indicate that most think Microsoft will win this case before the Supreme Court, yesterday Microsoft was hit with a $1.5 billion jury verdict in another patent infringement case. That case is about patents relating to the MP3 audio format, the most popular audio encoding format for music files. Microsoft licenses a group of patents relating to MP3 technology from the Fraunhofer Institute, a German consortium that developed the standard. However, Alcatel-Lucent, the plaintiff, asserted that it owned two patents that also covered MP3 technology. Alcatel-Lucent's predecessor was Bell Labs, who allegedly developed these two patents before joining with the Fraunhofer consortium to develop the MP3 standard. Because they were previously-developed, Alcatel-Lucent argued that they were not a part of the consortium's patents covering the technology, and a jury agreed. This verdict potentially puts all licensing of MP3 technology into turmoil, as if the Alcatel-Lucent patents also cover the technology, companies utilizing the technology would have to pay royalties to both the Fraunhofer consortium and Alcatel-Lucent, potentially driving up the cost of the technology. Microsoft has stated that if the judge does not reduce or overturn the verdict, it will appeal to the Federal Circuit. If that occurs, it will be a case to watch.

Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.