Filewrapper®

Outdoor outfitters at odds over outerwear, order overturned

April 06, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

Competing sporting goods retailers Bass Pro Shops and Cabela's faced off in the Federal Circuit. The parties were involved in an earlier patent infringement suit where Bass Pro Shops sued Cabela's for infringing its patent relating to a vest with a "pivotable seat member." The parties settled that suit, and the court entered an order barring Cabela's from selling infringing garments during the life of the patent. Cabela's started selling a modified garment, which it contended did not infringe. Bass Pro Shops (and the district court) disagreed, and Cabela's was found to be in contempt of the order.

The Federal Circuit vacated the contempt order, finding Cabela's redesigned garment did not infringe Bass Pro Shops' patent because it was not a "vest." The preamble of the relevant claims stated that the claimed invention was a "combination vest and pivotable seat member, said vest comprising . . ." The court found that based on the specification and prosecution history, the "vest" limitation was a substantive limitation on the claims, and therefore Cabela's redesign, which was a backpack rather than a vest, did not infringe.

More details of the case after the jump.

The patent at issue claims:

1. A combination vest and pivotable seat member, said vest comprising a fabric to be worn on an upper torso of a user, said vest comprising at least a dorsal member and shoulder support means, said seat member having one end connected to a lower portion of said dorsal member and having straps for being connected to and supported from an upper portion of said dorsal member whereby an effective chair comprised of said seat member and said dorsal member for supporting said user is created, lengths of said straps being adjustable, whereby an angular orientation between said seat member and said dorsal member is adjustable.

Figures 1 and 2 from the patent are representative of the invention:

Cabela's modified its garment to make it so it wasn't a "vest," but instead more of a backpack. The modified garment is pictured below:

Bass Pro Shops argued that because the word "vest" appeared only in the preamble, the claim did not actually require the garment to be a vest. The court disagreed, noting that "[t]hroughout the specification, and in all the claims, the patentee describes the invention as a combination of a vest and a folding seat." In addition, claim 1 as filed did not state that it claimed a vest, but rather a "garment." Thus, both the language of the specification and the prosecution history of the patent supported the requirement that the patent was limited to "vests," and as a result, Cabela's backpack seat did not infringe. As a result, the finding of contempt was vacated.

To read the full decision in Bass Pro Trademarks, L.L.C. v. Cabela's, Inc., click here.


Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment



Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.