Filewrapper® |
Office of Management and Budget approves USPTO's new continuation rules
July 10, 2007
Post by Blog Staff
The Office of Management and Budget has approved the two new rules promulgated by the USPTO relating to continuation applications and examination of claims. Apparently the meetings with various groups did not convince the OMB that the rules were inconsistent with the USPTO's regulatory authority. The rules are rumored to be different than those originally proposed in January 2006. Many in the patent bar did not like the fact that the USPTO did not release a revised set of proposed rules after the USPTO received over 300 comments on the initially proposed rules.
Expect an announcement from the USPTO and accompanying Federal Register notice soon.
Previous coverage of the proposed rules can be found in these posts: March 2, April 30, May 11, and June 20.
Hat tip: Patently-O.
Post Categories
Search Posts
Latest Posts
Meet DABUS: An Artificial Intelligence Machine Hoping to Maintain Two Patent Applications in its own Name
August 22, 2019
Claim Construction Must be Resolved Before Making Eligibility Determinations
August 19, 2019
"The" Ohio State Tries to Trademark the Word "THE"
August 15, 2019
Purpose
The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.
Disclaimer
McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.
Your Worldwide IP Partner since 1924 ™Services |