More examination outsourcing by the USPTO?

September 17, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

According to a news release published today, the USPTO is exploring the feasability of having the Swedish Patent and Registration Office (PRV) perform the search and examination of international applications filed under the PCT in the U.S. receiving office. In the release, the USPTO notes that it receives about 50,000 international applications and about 400,000 national applications per year. The pilot program will only involve 50 applications, but there is no word as to whether applicants will be notified if they are a part of the program or have an opportunity to request that they not be a part of the program.

The move to potentially shift the search and examination responsibilities for the 50,000 international applications away from the USPTO is in line with other efforts by the office to reduce the application backlog. Of course, this sort of examination outsourcing is one of the concerns POPA has with the Patent Reform Act, although arguably not as problematic as it deals with international applications rather than national applications.

Update (3:00 PM): One emailer has noted that a previous pilot program started in 2005 with several domestic firms, and another program outsourcing additional PCT searches to IP Australia began in 2005 and was extended in February.

Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.