Levi's Sues Over Pocket "Tab"

October 10, 2017
Post by Nicholas J. Krob

Can you use of a piece of fabric no bigger than a fingernail to constitute a trademark infringement?  Levi’s appears to think so.

Late last month, Levi Strauss & Co. filed a federal lawsuit in San Francisco against Vineyard Vines, LLC alleging the clothing company has been infringing Levi’s trademark rights by sewing a small “tab” onto the back pocket of its jeans. Levi’s claims that it has been sewing “tabs” onto the back pocket of its jeans since 1936 and that such tabs have become a “famous and recognized” trademark of Levi’s pants. Accordingly, it believes Vineyard Vines’ inclusion of a similar size and shaped tab, bearing the company’s whale logo, on the back pocket of its jeans constitutes trademark infringement.

Chances are, if you own a pair of Levi’s or have seen someone wearing a pair, you have noticed the “tab” Levi’s is referring to. This tab, which is normally red and bears the word “Levi’s,” was allegedly added for the very purpose of allowing consumers to easily identify Levi’s pants. Levi’s thus alleges that Vineyard Vines’ use of a similar tab will confuse consumers.

While a small tab sewn on to the back pocket of a pair of pants may seem like an unusual trademark, it illustrates the underlying purpose of trademark law. Trademarks are designed as source identifiers, or as a way for consumers to quickly and easily distinguish the source of good or services from those of another. Classic examples of this are words like “Coca Cola” and “Pepsi.” But this function can also be accomplished by non-word marks, like a distinctive tag affixed to clothing.

With this in mind, it is clear that even something as minor as affixing a small piece of fabric to the back pocket of a pair of pants can constitute trademark infringement. The ultimate question, however, is whether it does here. Notably, do differences between Levi’s and Vineyard Vines’ tabs—such as their color and logos—differentiate the two enough for the latter to avoid liability for infringement? Or are Levi’s rights in its tab trademark so extensive as to cover virtually any pocket tab? This remains for the court or jury to decide.


Nicholas Krob is an Intellectual Property Attorney in the Litigation Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. For additional information please visit or contact Nick directly via email at


Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.