Filewrapper®

Dramatic change in UK trademark policy; Australia eliminates obligation to disclose search reports

October 23, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

There have been two interesting changes in foreign IP practice over the past month.

Effective October 1, 2007, the UK Trade Marks Office changed its policy such that it will no longer raise objections to applications based on prior existing applications/registrations. Instead, it will be the policy to write to owners of earlier potentially conflicting marks advising them of the application so that the owners can file Oppositions if desired.The UK office will write to owners of prior existing UK trademarks, but will only write to the owners of Community Trademarks if the owners have paid to opt into the notification system. The cost of opting in for a 3 year period will be approximately $250.

In Australia, IP Australia has revised its regulations to eliminate the requirement to disclose searches performed by other patent offices. This change is effective on October 22, and applies to any application where the last day to comply with the previous duty to inform the office was on October 22 or before. Previous applications still must comply with the requirement, and the change does not excuse a failure to comply in those applications.

Peter Zura has an interesting post regarding the rulemaking process in Australia regarding this change, and how the views of practitioners and the public were taken into account (in contrast to how the USPTO has promulgated its most recent rules).


Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment



Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.

Captcha Image