200 companies express further concerns over Patent Reform Act of 2007

June 20, 2007
Post by Blog Staff

The hits just keep on coming for the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (H.R. 1908 and S. 1145). Over the past two weeks, Chief Judge Paul Michel of the Federal Circuit sent two letters criticizing portions of the Act. Before that, a group of Senators noted their concerns with the Act. Just after the Act was introduced, a coalition of over 100 companies expressed their concerns about the act. Now, many of those same companies, along with over a hundred more, have written another letter expressing their opposition to several provisions of the Patent Reform Act of 2007.

The letter targets what have emerged as the three most controversial provisions in the Act: apportionment of damages, an open-ended post-grant review procedure, and enhanced rulemaking authority for the USPTO.

In addition to this letter, Representative James Sensenbrenner has also written a letter to Representative John Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. In his letter, he notes ten issues that have received little or no discussion in the hearings that have been held on the Act thus far in the House, and requests that before the bill is advanced out of committee that hearings be held to answer questions regarding the issues he raises.

With the flurry of letters being sent to Congress (and within Congress), opposition to the Patent Reform Act of 2007 appears to be building. We'll be monitoring the status of the legislation to see whether changes are made in response to these various concerns.

Post Categories

Comments (0)
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog

Search Posts


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole.

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.