Filewrapper-old

USPTO Cancels Washington, D.C. NFL Franchise's Trademark Registrations
June 19, 2014

    The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a decision yesterday cancelling six federal trademark registrations owned by the Washington, D.C. National Football League franchise. The cancellation proceeding was brought by five Native American petitioners on the basis that the marks disparage persons or bring them into contempt or disrepute in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a). The Trademark Trial and....... Read More


    Today's lesson from the Federal Circuit (that you should already know): Don't miss deadlines
    February 27, 2007

      In a case decided today, the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB's dismissal of a party's cancellation claim. The party seeking cancellation sought to do so by proving uncontrolled licensing of the trademark, but failed to file a notice of reliance with regard to the relevant testimony on the issue before the deadline. The TTAB denied the motion to reopen the testimony period, finding no excusable neglect. The Fe....... Read More


      TTAB now allows citation of nonprecedential opinions
      January 24, 2007

        In a notice posted in the USPTO Official Gazette yesterday, the TTAB has changed its rules, now allowing citation to TTAB decisions designated non-precedential. Under the former rule, any non-precedential decisions cited before the TTAB were disregarded. Now, while only opinions designated as precedential are binding on the TTAB, a non-precedential opinion "may be cited for whatever persuasive value it might hav....... Read More


        2006 TTAB year in review
        January 12, 2007

          John Welch at The TTABlog has compiled a list of all citable opinions of the TTAB in 2006 organized by the substantive legal issue in each decision. This is a useful tool when looking for the most recent TTAB case law on a particular issue. The 57 citable decisions in 2006 are almost double the total number of citable decisions for the past two years: there were only 18 in 2005 and 13 in 2004. Welch has similar....... Read More


            Newer Posts Older Posts  

          Purpose

          The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

          Disclaimer

          McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole

          Connect with MVS

          Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

          Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

          Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

            I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.