Seventh Circuit: no evidence of use of "Stealth" mark, cancellation affirmed
July 09, 2007

In a ruling today, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the cancellation of one of Leo Stoller's many "STEALTH" registrations (owned by one of his companies) for lack of use. The registration in question for "baseball bats, softball bats, and t-ball bats," was the basis for a suit brought against baseball hall of famer George Brett and his company, Brett Brothers Sports International, when they released a bat named the "Stealth."

The Seventh Circuit also affirmed the lower court's award of attorney fees and costs to Brett under 15 U.S.C. § 1117. In the Seventh Circuit, such an award is reviewed under the clear error standard, which only is found if the ruling strikes the court "as wrong with the force of a 5-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish." Here, the court had no trouble agreeing with the district court's ruling that this was an exceptional case, and attorney fees were appropriate.

This is another decision in a series that have gone against Mr. Stoller, from being sanctioned by the TTAB last year, the end of his opposition to Google's trademark application at the USPTO, to a court ordering, and the USPTO executing, the cancellation of 34 of Mr. Stoller's "STEALTH" registrations.

Also of interest in the ruling is a description of the famous "Pine Tar" incident involving George Brett, which takes up the first three pages of the opinion. The court even provides a link to a video of the incident on YouTube. Baseball fan Howard Bashman has links to more on the Pine Tar incident over at How Appealing.

To read the full decision in Cent. Mfg. Co. v. Brett, click here.

The TTABlog posts about the case here.

Post has no comments.
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog
  Newer Posts Older Posts  


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.