Glaxo's preliminary injunction motion to be heard October 31, consolidated with earlier challenge
October 18, 2007

In orders yesterday in GlaxoSmithKline's effort to stop implementation of the new continuation and claim limit rules, the USPTO's request to continue the preliminary injunction hearing until October 31 was granted in order to give the Office more time to respond to the motion. Also, Glaxo's case was consolidated with an earlier case filed challenging the validity of the rules, and reassigned to the judge assigned to that case, Judge James C. Cacheris.

Interstingly, like Judge Hilton (to whom the case was originally assigned), Judge Cacheris is also a Reagan appointee who has taken senior status. Judge Cacheris also served as the District's Chief Judge from 1991-1997, and Judge Hilton was his successor in that capacity, serving as Chief Judge from 1997-2004.

Relevant links:

John White and Gene Quinn at the PLI Patent Law blog have issued a "call to arms" to the patent law community to either join the lawsuit or file an amicus brief in support of Glaxo. They also have posted a submission that suggests that the rules, as promulgated, actually may allow more than a single RCE in an application family, depending on how they are interpreted.

Update (10/24): The PLI Patent Law blog will have John White in attendance and will be providing updates during the hearing.

Post has no comments.
Post a Comment

Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog
  Newer Posts Older Posts  


The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.


McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.