Filewrapper-old

$1.5 billion infringement verdict against Microsoft vacated
August 07, 2007

A judge in the Southern District of California yesterday set aside a $1.5 billion infringement verdict against Microsoft in favor of Alcatel-Lucent (more detail on the facts of the case can be found in this post).

The judgment was the largest ever in a patent infringement lawsuit, and has been used as an example (see page 15 of Anthony Peterman's testimony before the House, which specifically references this case) in support of the damages apportionment provisions of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (H.R. 1908 and S. 1145). With Congress in recess, the bill will not undergo further consideration until after Labor Day, but it will be interesting if opponents of the bill use this news as a further argument against adopting at least the highly controversial damages apportionment provisions in the bill.

Update (9/5): Bloomberg agrees that this decision may hurt the Patent Reform Act's chances in Congress.

How Appealing has collected the media coverage of the court's decision.

Post has no comments.
Post a Comment




Captcha Image
Return to the Filewrapper Blog
  Newer Posts Older Posts  

Purpose

The attorneys of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. designed this blog as an informational and educational resource about intellectual property law for our clients, other attorneys, and the public as a whole. Our goal is to provide cutting-edge information about recent developments in intellectual property law, including relevant case law updates, proposed legislation, and intellectual property law in the news.

Disclaimer

McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. provides this blog for general informational purposes only. By using this blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C. Do not consider this blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney. While we try to revise this blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. We consciously refrain from expressing opinions on this blog and instead, offer it as a form of information and education, however if there appears an expression of opinion, realize that those views are indicative of the individual and not of the firm as a whole

Connect with MVS

Enter your name and email address to recieve the latest news and updates from us and our attorneys.

Subscribe to: MVS Newsletter

Subscribe to: Filewrapper® Blog Updates

  I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.

Captcha Image